CFVA eagle
CFVA ScreeningFederal Exclusion Screening for Healthcare
★ Federal Exclusion Screening · Healthcare

Employing one excluded person can cost your practice tens of thousands — and the law says you should have checked.

If your practice bills Medicaid or Denti-Cal, federal law holds you responsible for screening every employee and vendor against the exclusion lists — every month — and proving you did. We run that screen and hand you the dated record. You stay protected.

No commitment to see your first report · A real person, based in Sacramento · Every claim on this page is verifiable on oig.hhs.gov
MonthlyThe OIG's stated screening cadence
$25,595Max civil penalty — per item, per claim
×3Treble damages on every amount claimed
"Should have known"The standard — good intentions aren't a defense
Why this matters

This is not a marketing problem. It is a federal liability sitting on your payroll.

Most practice owners have never read the statute — and that is exactly the exposure. The obligation to screen does not come from a vendor trying to sell you something. It comes from the Social Security Act and the Code of Federal Regulations, and it has been enforced against practices of every size, including solo physicians and small clinics, for years.

The core rule is simple and unforgiving: no federal health care program will pay for anything furnished, ordered, or prescribed by an excluded person. The moment an excluded individual touches a claim — as a hygienist, a nurse, a biller, a contractor, even a back-office administrator whose work feeds a billable service — every one of those claims becomes a violation. Not a warning. A violation, priced per item.

42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7
Authorizes the OIG to exclude individuals and entities from all federal health care programs, and to maintain the public List of Excluded Individuals/Entities (LEIE). oig.hhs.gov/exclusions
§ 1128A(a)(1) SSA
Imposes civil monetary penalties on those who employ or contract with an excluded person and submit affected claims — penalties per item, plus treble damages.
42 CFR § 1001.1901
Sets out the effect of exclusion and the provider's responsibility to ensure it does not employ or contract with excluded parties. ecfr.gov
42 CFR Part 1003
Governs civil money penalties, assessments, and exclusions — including the aggravating factor of "knew or should have known." ecfr.gov

"OIG's LEIE must be checked on a monthly basis… To avoid CMP liability, health care entities should routinely check the list to ensure that new hires and current employees are not on it."

— HHS Office of Inspector General, Exclusions Program · oig.hhs.gov/exclusions

The obligation applies whether you screen or not

There is no version of this where you opt out of the liability. You are responsible the day an excluded person touches a claim — whether the hire was deliberate or an honest oversight. The OIG's enforcement standard is "knew or should have known," and because the LEIE is public and free, the law expects you to have checked — so a good-faith "we didn't realize" unfortunately doesn't lift the liability. That is precisely why a simple, documented monthly screen matters.

How practices actually get caught

It is rarely an investigator at your front door. The exposure surfaces three quiet ways:

1. Automated claims-matching. The OIG and CMS contractors cross-reference submitted claims data against the LEIE by computer. An excluded name on your claims can surface without anyone visiting your office.

2. Routine audits. During a payer or program audit, you are asked to produce your screening records. No dated proof of monthly screening is itself the finding.

3. Whistleblowers. A former employee or competitor reports you — and under the False Claims Act, they share in the recovery, which is why these reports happen.

Sources: HHS-OIG Exclusions Program; OIG Updated Special Advisory Bulletin on the Effect of Exclusion; 42 CFR Parts 1001 & 1003. All linked above resolve to oig.hhs.gov and ecfr.gov.

The record — public OIG settlements

It happens to practices your size. Here is the proof, by name.

Every settlement below is a real, public OIG enforcement action for employing an excluded individual. Not hospitals only — solo physicians, small clinics, pharmacies, addiction and home-care providers. You can verify each on the government's own enforcement pages.

$61,143Single physician
William H. Newman, M.D. / Allergy & Asthma Specialists of Northern Vermont. Settled with OIG for employing one excluded registered nurse whose services were billed to federal programs. One doctor, one nurse.
$153,073Excluded nurse
Sharp Healthcare, San Diego, CA (Dec 2024). Employed a nurse excluded from federal programs; services were billed to federal health care programs.
$243,000One LPN
Walnut Creek Nursing Center, Dayton, OH. Employed a single excluded licensed practical nurse who furnished billable services. One nurse, a quarter-million-dollar penalty.
$73,457Back-office role
Action Recovery Group, Ogden, UT. An addiction-treatment center that employed an excluded operations assistant — proof the liability reaches non-clinical staff whose work feeds billing.
$310,874Five-year run
Connecticut psychiatric practice. Employed an excluded clinical director for five years using federal reimbursement to pay the salary — showing how exposure compounds the longer it goes unscreened.
$866,339Single aide
Chinese American Planning Council Home Attendant Program, NY. Employed one personal assistant excluded from NY Medicaid. Home-care and small agencies are squarely in scope.
$41,740Solo practice
Adriana Strimbu, DPM (podiatrist). A one-person practice, settled for employing a single excluded individual. Size is no shield.
Verify these and the full, continuously updated list on the government's own pages: OIG Enforcement Actions · Civil Monetary Penalties & Affirmative Exclusions. We cite the government — never ourselves.
How it works & why us

We do the work. You keep the proof. We answer the phone.

1

Send us your roster

A simple list of staff, contractors, and vendors — names, plus NPI if you have it. No SSNs, no patient data, ever.

2

We screen every name, monthly

Against the federal exclusion and sanction lists — OIG LEIE, GSA/SAM, and OFAC — and flag the few that need a closer look.

3

You receive a dated report

A clean PDF showing who is clear and who to verify — the dated, attributed record an auditor asks for. Every month, on file.

4

A potential match is never an accusation

We tell you exactly which few names to confirm at the official source before any action — so you act on certainty, not a name collision.

Why CFVA — not the enterprise vendors

The large compliance firms were built for hospitals and health systems: per-provider contracts, annual lock-ins, and a sales team that won't return a small practice's call. We were built for the practices they ignore.

The big vendors
CFVA
Per-provider, per-year pricing
Flat monthly rate
Annual contracts & lock-in
Cancel anytime
Software to learn & configure
Email a roster, get a report
A help desk & a queue
A real person who answers
Built for hospitals
Built for your practice
Get started

Protection priced like a utility, not an enterprise contract.

Want to see the actual report first? Request a sample. When you're ready, choose your level.

Base

Monthly federal exclusion screening — the core legal obligation, fully covered.
  • Monthly screening: OIG LEIE · SAM · OFAC
  • Full staff, contractor & vendor roster
  • Dated PDF compliance report
  • Audit-ready documentation, on file
  • Direct support from a real person
Simple monthly subscription · cancel anytime
Start with Base
Billed securely via Stripe

Plus — Tailored Compliance

Everything in Base, plus the state-level and board-level checks that federal screening alone doesn't cover.
  • Everything in Base
  • Your state's Medicaid exclusion list — a separate obligation from the federal LEIE
  • State license-board discipline (revoked, suspended & surrendered licenses)
  • Deeper vendor & contractor screening for multi-location practices
  • Audit-response support if a payer ever asks for your records
Tailored to your practice · we confirm scope first
Choose Plus
We'll confirm what you need before you start
When practices move to Plus

Base covers the federal obligation every billing practice shares. Most owners start here — it's the check the OIG expects and the dated record an auditor asks for first.

Plus exists because federal isn't the whole picture. If you bill a state Medicaid program, that state very likely maintains its own exclusion list, separate from the federal LEIE — and screening the federal list does not satisfy the state one. Practices tend to move to Plus when any of these become true:

  • You bill Medicaid or Denti-Cal directly and want the matching state exclusion list covered, not just the federal one.
  • You add locations or take on more contractors — the roster grows and so does the surface area to screen.
  • You've had (or fear) a payer audit and want board-discipline history and audit-response support on file.
  • You hire clinicians whose licenses you want continuously checked against board actions in your state.

Your roster stays private. We only receive staff or vendor data after you're a client, under a short written agreement that spells out how it's handled — and we don't retain it if you leave. A sample report uses example data, so you can see exactly what you'll get without sending us anything confidential.

Not sure which fits today? Start on Base — you can move up the moment your exposure changes, and we'll confirm exactly what your state requires before you pay a cent more. Or request a sample report to see the deliverable first.

See the actual report before you commit.

Tell us a little about your practice and we'll send you a sample report — the real format, the real flags, the exact documentation you'd receive each month. No roster required to see it. When it fits, you subscribe, and the screening begins.

Request a Sample Report
Or email support@cfaisolutions.com — we typically reply the same day.